All that (for example) 12 title reigns (HHH) or 16 title reigns (Ric Flair) signifies is that you lost the belt so many times because you never have been a good champion. Why don't people start looking at it properly and look at the combined days that these guys have held the title for? And what's funny and deluded is that the likes of HHH and Flair view their multiple world title reigns as an accomplishment.|||Completely 100% agree with you.
I'm really confused that everytime guys such as Triple H, Edge, John Cena, The Undertaker (just to name a few), Jim Ross or Michael Cole or any other commentators keep saying how many world titles they won. For example : "You look at the thirteen time world champion, Triple H."
I think there's no need to mention how many times champion they are, instead those commentators should say that they're great champions or they are former world champions.
Being multiple world champion isn't an accomplishment, just look at the boxing business.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment