Thursday, November 24, 2011

What type of world champion do you prefer?

The champion get into a couple of high profile feuds and have a series of matches and trade wins %26amp; trade the belt back and forth.





Or





The champion just plows thru everybody ppv after ppv beats everybody on the roster and has a year long reign.|||Good Question, Star for you.





I like a bit of a mix, to be honest.





When they first win the belt, its good to see, like 3 victories over 3 different people, then a shock loss, then reclaim the title, then enter into a good long term feud.





I don't like the Triple H type champ, even though I like Trip. When he's champ, no one beats him. Same as Cena, He seems to dominate as champ and it gets boring.|||"A World Heavyweight Champion that would only


appear for Live! television interviews, wrestle only


the Number One Contender, and only wrestle in


the Main Event of a Pay-per-view Event, once a


month, and NO NON-TITLE MATCH-UPS, and


absolutely NO TAG TEAM MATCH-UPS."





"You're not the Number One Contender, you're


not going to get an opportunity to wrestle for


the World Heavyweight Championship. Ever!"|||I like the first better...as long as the series of matches are great matches. Keeps things more interesting I believe.





The only reason I didn't say your second option was because you said plows. Which means he's invincible for a year, that gets boring easy. If there were some tough feuds, and the reign was kept interesting, than I wouldn't mind a year long reign.|||I wolud like both..... but I wouldn't like for them to have a year long title reign, He can plow threw everybody and still loses every so often and have a couple of really heated fueds and switch titles back and forth to keep the fans interest, that is what kind of champion I would prefer.|||The champion is the person who works and beats everyone all the way to the top, the problem is remaining champion because everyone else wants to be number 1 too, so a champion needs to keep becoming stronger.|||The champion get into a couple of high profile feuds and have a series of matches and trade wins %26amp; trade the belt back and forth.|||The champion get into a couple of high profile feuds and have a series of matches and trade wins %26amp; trade the belt back and forth.|||It would get boring seeing the same guy holding the belt for a long time. But it would also be nice to see someone who couldnt be beat for a long time either.|||The type where you dominate like Batista and Cena in 2005 but if you do hold the title that long over and over, you get boring|||I would say a little bit of both too, but either one is fine with me as long as they do their job the right way.|||It can be both just as long as the champ has good matches and is entertaining|||the champ who gets into high profile fueds etc|||FIRST ONE|||I LIKE MY CHAMPS TO KEEP THE CHAMPIONSHIPS|||a little bit of both

No comments:

Post a Comment